<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Comparison of the Minimally Invasive Dual-Incision versus Posterolateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty</title>
	<link>http://medicaltourismblog.org/2008/10/15/a-comparison-of-the-minimally-invasive-dual-incision-versus-posterolateral-approach-in-total-hip-arthroplasty/</link>
	<description>Medical Tourism, Global Health Care: Low Cost Quality Surgery Abroad</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: JamesD</title>
		<link>http://medicaltourismblog.org/2008/10/15/a-comparison-of-the-minimally-invasive-dual-incision-versus-posterolateral-approach-in-total-hip-arthroplasty/#comment-7779</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://medicaltourismblog.org/2008/10/15/a-comparison-of-the-minimally-invasive-dual-incision-versus-posterolateral-approach-in-total-hip-arthroplasty/#comment-7779</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the useful info. It's so interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the useful info. It&#8217;s so interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanraj</title>
		<link>http://medicaltourismblog.org/2008/10/15/a-comparison-of-the-minimally-invasive-dual-incision-versus-posterolateral-approach-in-total-hip-arthroplasty/#comment-6250</link>
		<dc:creator>vanraj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 03:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://medicaltourismblog.org/2008/10/15/a-comparison-of-the-minimally-invasive-dual-incision-versus-posterolateral-approach-in-total-hip-arthroplasty/#comment-6250</guid>
		<description>verry good.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>verry good&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://medicaltourismblog.org/2008/10/15/a-comparison-of-the-minimally-invasive-dual-incision-versus-posterolateral-approach-in-total-hip-arthroplasty/#comment-5917</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://medicaltourismblog.org/2008/10/15/a-comparison-of-the-minimally-invasive-dual-incision-versus-posterolateral-approach-in-total-hip-arthroplasty/#comment-5917</guid>
		<description>Its interesting that with minimal invasive the operating time was still longer, hence more complications. Surely it shouldnt be defined as minimal invasive because of the time it takes and more complications?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its interesting that with minimal invasive the operating time was still longer, hence more complications. Surely it shouldnt be defined as minimal invasive because of the time it takes and more complications?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

